In re Alonso (Fed. Cir. 2008) from (PatentlyO),(PatentDoc)
立場変われば・・・の代表例ですね。
PatentlyO
This decision is nothing new. Broad claims must either be supported by multiple embodiments or some general principles describing how the single embodiment is applicable to other configurations.
PatentDoc
Unfortunately, this decision continues the Federal Circuit's practice of expanding the scope of the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as it is applied to biotechnology inventions
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿